I have a problem.
It all started with Fastrack; more with their latest ads. I saw two of them in the recent past. One, where a girl wakes up one morning from God-knows-where having spent the night with devil-knows-whom and wears her stuff on the way to who-knows-to-who-else!
And there is this other ad where a girl’s hand can’t but park itself on the wrong end of men’s spine!
I am not here to hold the moral candle and rant about the degrading standards of probity or the deplorable dilution of chastity among youth. No Sir. That’s not a subject I prefer to discuss in public; my views on the same notwithstanding.
Nor am I going to write about the falling standards of advertising and its blatant attempt at using sex and nocturnal overtones to titillate the viewers and arouse their interest in the brand; among arousing other things! This is a subject matter of another discussion. Though, I do recall having written about this in one of my previous columns.
This piece is about the advertising strategy of Fastrack. This is about the brand personality as has been portrayed in its advertising. This is about my views on the same; and my wish to get your comments on it as well.
Agreed there are quite a few flirtatious, frivolous and fun-seeking girls who are extremely promiscuous, highly inflammable, perennially resorting to offshore drilling and possessing a flesh fetish that would put a hyena to shame!
Agreed there might be a frightening few who, shall we say, take a more horizontal view of life, seeking the pleasure of vertical limits!
Agreed it is becoming more common nowadays to see a few girls who pledge their chastity and put their probity on ‘Aadi sale’ and not feel too worked up about it.
My point is this. Would a girl like to be seen that way by others? Would she care less about how others view her? Would she say ‘Yes, I am laying my cards on the table (pun intended) and yes I am a girl of low virtue and lower standards?
Wouldn’t a girl mind being termed that way in public even if she is one in private?
I believe a girl might want to have fun but not be in the spotlight for that reason. I think a girl might screw around but not have her name screwed for that reason.
By presenting the positioning in this manner, isn’t Fastrack telling its customers, ‘if you are that kind of a girl here is your opportunity to flaunt who you are’?
By portraying that personality, isn’t Fastrack telling the user, ‘hey, you are like this and go tell the world you are like that’?
Don’t consumers buy the brand’s image and advertising more than buying the brand? Isn’t the physical buying of the brand just a reflection of their having bought into the brand’s image? Aren’t image brands the badges customers wear on their selves to tell the world who they are?
When one wear a Nike, isn’t he trying to tell the world he has an attitude?
When one drives a Pulsar, isn’t he revealing to everyone he is stylish?
When one drinks Mountain Dew, isn’t he communicating to all and sundry that he is adventurous?
Isn’t this what branding all about?
If so…………..by wearing Fastrack wouldn’t a girl be telling the world she is frivolous, fun-loving and flirtatious? Wouldn’t she be telling the guys she can be outsourced? Wouldn’t she also be saying she is an FMCG product – Fast Moving Carefree Girl!
Maybe, I should go ask a few girls what they think about this piece. Maybe, I should pose these questions to a few girls who wear Fastrack.
If they take offense and fight, well that I can manage. But what if they construe it as an invite, and even worse accept?
You see, that’s my problem!
13 comments:
Having worked on the brand and having sat through FGD's the one thing I can add to your write up is that - like all brands mentioned there is this thing called aspiration, the guys who drink mountain dew definitely don't jump of a cliff and the guys who buy Nike probably don't know anything beyond about sports; in a similar sense FT plays up promiscuity and beyond doubt it seems kids love it.
Having worked on the brand and having sat through FGD's the one thing I can add to your write up is that - like all brands mentioned there is this thing called aspiration, the guys who drink mountain dew definitely don't jump of a cliff and the guys who buy Nike probably don't know anything beyond about sports; in a similar sense FT plays up promiscuity and beyond doubt it seems kids love it.
Having worked on the brand and having sat through FGD's the one thing I can add to your write up is that - like all brands mentioned there is this thing called aspiration, the guys who drink mountain dew definitely don't jump of a cliff and the guys who buy Nike probably don't know anything beyond about sports; in a similar sense FT plays up promiscuity and beyond doubt it seems kids love it.
Looks like lots of guys for sure are going to gift a lotta fastracks to gals these days.
Atleast i see their new campaign working that way.
Top it with current sale on the brand...
gotta check one of then stores soon
Looks like lots of guys for sure are going to gift a lotta fastracks to gals these days.
Atleast i see their new campaign working that way.
Top it with current sale on the brand...
gotta check the one of them stores soon
Wow, that was quite an article.
Quite a few girls must have started using Fastrack even before their "Move On" campaign which I guess was in 2008. At that time Fastrack meant nothing but trendy goodies for youth. When the Move on campaign was launched, they released this one ad that I remember, where a till-then-committed couple decide to break up and move on with a smile by exchanging their goodies.
Some girls chose to stick onto Fastrack even after this change in positioning, simply because they were used to it. Having worn such trendy stuff till then, it would look absurd to resort to other brands.
I, for instance have been using Fastrack for about 6 to 7 years now. But after watching those "Blame Fastrack" ads that were mentioned in the article, I would think twice before using Fastrack again and would happily Move on if I find another brand that could replace Fastrack.
Itzzz not 100% true.. ad jus focuses on move on n looks lik itzz working 4 dem as dey r monopoly in tat segment.. Fast Moving Carefree Girl - I would say it is similar to guy's axe deo ad...
A guy expects 2 attract girls using axe r othrs who copied tat bcos of lack of creativity.. y not a girl attract wit a watch...
Fantastic write up sir. As usual i would say. I guess through these advertisements Fasttrack aims to blatantly announce to the world the evolution in female psychology, 'radically modern' as they would term it, that which is usually considered taboo in our so called 'conservative' society which abides by it's 'culture'. When they say 'move on' they're probably attempting a shot at defining the modern youth of today, who, aspirations aside, doesn't care much about what others think about him/her, but stands by his own desires and terms such endeavours as 'fun'. Well, at the end of the day they're just confusing the audience and hoping, just like Axe, Fog, Set wet, Wild stone are, to exploit female sexuality and sex appeal(sometimes a literal appeal for sex) in their advertisements.
Once when the "move on" ad campaign was launched with the positioning of frivolous girls, i jus tot it was like a rival to Axe series jus like playgirl to playboy... But personally I was using fast track as my casual wear portraying its cool brand.. but being in a leadership position managing a team of youngsters, i have stopped using the brand having seen the latest 2 ads even for my saturday casual wear!
Once when the "move on" ad campaign was launched with the positioning of frivolous girls, i jus tot it was like a rival to Axe series jus like playgirl to playboy... But personally I was using fast track as my casual wear portraying its cool brand.. but being in a leadership position managing a team of youngsters, i have stopped using the brand having seen the latest 2 ads even for my saturday casual wear!
Hope you would have seen the recent 18again sd. If not, click the below link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPayFrCOiZM&feature=g-hist
This is even more bad. A women is communicating the message to the whole family including all her laws that she has tightened her genitals using the cream and everyone are rejoicing for it.
Having worked on the brand and having sat through FGD's the one thing I can add to your write up is that - like all brands mentioned there is this thing called aspiration, the guys who drink mountain dew definitely don't jump of a cliff and the guys who buy Nike probably don't know anything beyond about sports;
Sir,
on relating to your approach in FAST GIRLS,FAST TIMES,FASTACK,i think it is segment marketing.As CASIO markets for people who wants them on time without late to any place.TAG Heuer markets for people who concerns about built quality and technology and for peoples of high class.TITAN targets new couples and sells a pair of watches on same taste.
Coming to fastrack its consumers are young generation from lower middle class, especially youngsters emerging to social life.this peoples wants to wear a branded product at the same time they don't want to pay higher price.
I agree with your concept that buyers also buy the advertisement and feels the same way that model does in that advertisement.
like the three brand above said FASTRACK should selected a healthier advertisement campaign,a fastrack user should not feel shamed while watching the advertisement with family.
AXE and MANKIND also committing the same mistake nowadays.
even condom and sex tempting tablet companies playing better advertisement than FASTRACK,AXE and MANKIND.
companies should come out with only profit mentality and realize their brand position after 2 or 3 years.
Post a Comment